U.S. Capitol Police stand guard in front of the U.S. Capitol Building, on June 14, 2017, in Washington, DC. Mark Wilson—Getty Images
12:09 PM ET
When a gunman ambushed a practice for a charity congressional baseball game in Alexandria, Va., on Wednesday, at least five people were injured. And, witnesses have suggested, that number might have been higher had members of the U.S. Capitol Police not been there — as part of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise's security detail — to fire back.
"Without the Capitol Hill police, it would have been a massacre," Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul told the press.
As some speculate about whether partisan politics motivated the gunman — whohttps://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/874965106500698114?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet one of the congressmen if Democrats or Republicans were playing — it can be noted that the U.S. Capitol Police force, which is charged with protecting Congress, was established after one particular assault that took place in the polarized political climate that was 1828.
At the time, "Jacksonian" politicians (supporters of Andrew Jackson, who had nearly become president in 1824) had secured a majority in Congress after the midterm elections. Sitting President John Quincy Adams could have expected he was going to have to fight Jackson for the White House in the upcoming 1828 presidential election — but he probably didn't expect his son to get into an actual physical fight with a Jacksonian before Election Day.
Get your history fix in one place: sign up for the weekly TIME History newsletter
Russell Jarvis, a journalist for a pro-Jackson newspaper The Washington Telegraph, attended a New Year's Eve celebration at the White House with his wife and Boston relatives, when John Adams Jr., the president's son and personal secretary, made what Jarvis later described as a "grievous insult to the ladies of my family." Here's how a book that chronicled the political and social scene in mid-19th century Washington, D.C., Perley's Reminiscences of 60 Years in the National Metropolis, described the contretemps:
Mr. Jarvis introduced them courteously, and they then passed on into the East Room. Soon afterward they found themselves standing opposite to Mr. John Adams, who was conversing with the Rev. Mr. Stetson. "Who is that lady?" asked Mr. Stetson. "That," replied Mr. John Adams, in a tone so loud that the party heard it, "is the wife of one Russell Jarvis, and if he knew how contemptibly he is viewed in this house they would not be here." The Bostonians at once paid their respects to Mrs. Adams and withdrew, Mr. Jarvis having first ascertained from Mr. Stetson that it was Mr. John Adams who had insulted them. A few days afterward Mr. Jarvis sent a note to Mr. John Adams, demanding an explanation, by a friend of his, Mr. McLean. Mr. Adams told Mr. McLean that he had no apology to make to Mr. Jarvis, and that he wished no correspondence with him.
Jarvis is said to have been waiting for the right moment to seek revenge when he saw Adams in the Capitol Rotunda in April 1828. He said he asked the junior Adams if he would apologize, and when he didn't, "I was excited by his continued refusal, and by a recollection of the offense, to commit an assault upon his person, which consisted merely in pulling his nose and slapping one side of his face, with my open hand," Jarvis recalled, according to a personal account of the incident published in the newspaper Niles' Register.
Jarvis's actions have been described as "all standard and approved provocations for a duel," according to the biography of presidential families America's Royalty: All the Presidents' Children, "however, John Quincy Adams's disapproval for dueling was made evident when he responded for his son by sending a message to Congress...requesting that Congress provide funds to secure the way between the president's office and Congress so that future incidents could be prevented."
Congress passed the act creating the U.S. Capitol Police on May 2, 1828.